THE fuel subsidy scandal appears to be too big a ‘family affair’ for the Peoples Democratic Party. We learnt that the party had encountered difficulties in its bid to douse the scandal.
Already,
there are indications that some chieftains of the PDP are concerned
that the House of Representatives’ panel report would have an adverse
effect on the fortunes of the party in the 2015 general elections.
Leaders of the PDP, who spoke with us
on the condition of anonymity at the weekend, indicated that the
mismanagement of the subsidy fund involved too many members of the
party.
“Our concern is that if we intervene to save indicted members of the party, it could boomerang.
“Already,
people are lambasting the PDP over the indictment of a former Delta
State Governor, James Ibori, in London. Ibori was discharged in Nigeria.
If we go-ahead and treat the subsidy report as a family affair,
Nigerians will descend on us,” a member of the party’s National Working
Committee told one of our correspondents at the weekend.
Another
top member of the PDP, who asked not to be named, said the “scandal can
enrage the citizens and make them to work against our party in future
elections if we do not tread softly.”
The
PDP’s senior officials are billed for a meeting on Monday (today) to
discuss the House panel report and decide on what would be its response
to the scandal. The party chiefs might also devise strategies to counter
the negative effects of the report on the party.
The
National Publicity Secretary of the PDP, Chief Olisah Metuh, confirmed
to one our correspondents on the telephone on Sunday that the PDP would
meet today.
The party has not reacted
to the scandal though opposition parties and other stakeholders have
condemned the fraud as exposed by the House panel.
The PDP NWC member, who spoke to us, said the party would take its time to react to the fuel subsidy scandal.
“Our
concern is how to appropriately respond to the scandal in which many of
our members are involved and that is why we have been keeping quiet,”
he said.
The source added that some
of the top people indicted in the report were serving ministers and
others who are nursing senatorial and governorship ambitions.
Although
the report has not been discussed by the NWC, our correspondents
gathered that its (NWC) members were divided on how the report should be
handled.
It was gathered some of the
NWC members had been trying to persuade their party members in the
committee to intervene and save the indicted party men and women.
The
NWC member, who spoke to one of our correspondents, said, “Those who
hold this view are saying that there is no way the party will not be
affected, if members mentioned in the report are left to their fate.”
The source said that if implemented, the House committee report would affect several members of the PDP in high places.
However,
a source told one of our correspondents that the Presidency and the
leadership of the PDP were hoping to use the Senate Committee as “their
joker to rubbish the findings of the lower chamber.”
“The
plan is that they want to delay implementation until after the Senate
concludes its probe. You know that the Senate is also looking at the
same subsidy issue.
“The reason is clear. If they implement the report as it is, my brother, so many top PDP members will be bruised.
“Apart
from the top members of PDP who held strategic positions in the PPPRA,
the NNPC or the Ministry of Petroleum, several others will be affected.
“Many
of the indicted oil firms are owned by members of the PDP, and that
explains why the PDP cannot rush to comment on the committee’s report.
“You
know also that you cannot touch the board of the PPPRA without touching
the Minister of Petroleum. Also, a PDP governor was also mentioned.”
The
House committee that probed the oil subsidy regime in the country
submitted its report last week. A major highlight of the report is that
the subsidy administration is heavily compromised.
As
a result, the committee recommended that a total of N1.7bn be refunded
by some government agencies, including the NNPC, PPPRA, the Office of
the Accountant-General of the Federation and 72 firms.
In
addition, the House panel recommended that the refund should be made
within three months and that the anti-graft agency, Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission, be invited to investigate and prosecute
culprits.
Already, opposition
political parties and other stakeholders have asked for the prosecution
of the affected individuals, agencies and companies.
No comments:
Post a Comment