Deputy
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mr. Emeka Ihedioha, on
Wednesday came under fire from members for allegedly shielding the
Minister of Petroleum Resources, Mrs. Diezani Alison-Madueke, from
prosecution.
The uproar in the House came after
Ihedioha overruled a motion demanding the minister’s resignation over
her role in the N1.07tn fuel subsidy scam.
The House had resumed consideration of
the fuel subsidy probe report on Wednesday, when a member from Akwa Ibom
State, Mr. Robinson Uwak, raised a point of order on privilege.
He drew the attention of the House to public opinion suggesting that lawmakers were ‘shielding’ Alison-Madueke from prosecution.
Uwak said, “The people of my constituency and Nigerians out there have been bombarding me with calls since yesterday (Tuesday).
“They have accused the House of
shielding the minister. I hereby call for the resignation of the
Minister of Petroleum Resources.”
The lawmaker’s demand was hinged on a
key recommendation of the report, which directed that “the management
and board of the NNPC should be completely overhauled” for their role in
the scam.
Alison-Madueke is the chairman of the Board of the NNPC.
Uwak’s argument was that the minister should resign rather than being the one to preside over the overhaul of the NNPC.
But Ihedioha intervened by asking the Deputy Leader of the House, Mr. Leo Ogor, to respond to the motion.
Ogor told the House that Uwak was
jumping the gun, adding that at the appropriate time, the House would
address the issue of the minister.
“We are guided by House rules and
decisions will be taken at the appropriate time. We should accord
respect to due process,” he said.
He had hardly completed his statement when lawmakers shouted him down.
They insisted that Uwak’s motion should be heard, but the deputy speaker abruptly overruled them.
Ihedioha’s ruling infuriated the
majority of the 245 members who attended the session, prompting shouts
of “no”, “no”, “noooo!” He, however, ignored the uproar.
But, the spokesman for the House, Mr. Zakari Mohammed, denied that Ihedioha was shielding the minister.
According to him, the House felt that
the recommendation to overhaul the NNPC and its board had already taken
care of the minister.
“There has been a clear case of indictment; so calling names or saying that the minister should resign is not necessary.
It has been taken care of by our recommendation,” he told journalists.
The report, which recommended the
investigation and prosecution of the affected officials, listed specific
“infractions” committed by them.
These included the payment of N285.098bn
by the NNPC to itself in “excess of the PPPRA’s recommended figure for
2011” and the deduction of N310.4bn for kerosene subsidy from crude oil
proceeds.
The House cleared Gombe State Governor,
Ibrahim Dankwambo, over the controversial payment of N999m a total of
128 times to “unknown entities” in 2009 as subsidy claims by the Office
of the Accountant-General of the Federation.
Dankwambo was the AGF when the payments were made within 24 hours between January 12 and 13, 2009.
The total amount was put at N127.8bn.
The report of the Ad Hoc Committee on
Monitoring of the Subsidy Regime headed by Mr. Farouk Lawan had
recommended that anti-graft agencies should investigate the payments.
But, on Wednesday, the House amended the
recommendation to indicate that the PPPRA and not the AG’s office
should account for the payments.
This followed fresh submissions by Lawan, who said that the PPPRA had owned up to making the payments.
He informed members that the Central
Bank of Nigeria, the AGF’s office and the PPPRA, in three separate
letters to the Speaker of the House, Mr. Aminu Tambuwal, all admitted
that the PPPRA made the payments.
Lawan also cited publications by the PPPRA, where it listed the beneficiaries of the N127.8bn.
He explained that the panel made its
earlier recommendation because while the investigation was on, the AG’s
office was not forthcoming with information on the transactions.
He, however, maintained that the panel
considered the “payments to be irregular,” and suggested that the
searchlight be turned on the PPPRA by anti-graft agencies.
The House adopted the amendment, an indication that Dankwambo had been exonerated.
Lawmakers endorsed the recommendation to
pass a bill to ‘criminalise’ extra-budgetary expenditure by the
executive arm of government.
In particular, the House adopted the
recommendation directing anti-graft agencies to investigate and
prosecute all officials of the Ministry of Finance, Office of the
Director-General Budget, and the Office of the Accountant-General of the
Federation involved in extra-budgetary spending between 2009 and 2011.
The House adopted the recommendation on
the audit firms of Akintola Williams, Deloitte, and Olusola Adekanola
& Partners, pronouncing harsher penalties on the firms.
In addition to being blacklisted for
three years by the Federal Ministry of Finance, the House recommended
their prosecution for “professional negligence and connivance” in
failing to properly audit the fuel subsidy transactions.
The House opposed the Federal
Government’s decision to appoint the Managing Director of Access Bank,
Mr. Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede, as the head of a panel to verify subsidy
claims after the sacking the audit firms. It recommended the engagement
of an independent audit firm to do the job.
The Minority Leader of the House, Mr.
Femi Gbajabiamila, who proposed the amendment, described the said banker
as “a managing director, who is a close associate of Mr. President and a
member of the economic management team.”
He argued that such a person could not be trusted to do a through verification of subsidy claims on behalf of Nigerians.
The lawmakers also adopted the
recommendation that the 71 firms that got subsidy claims in 2011 without
evidence of supplying fuel should refund N230.2bn.
However, the House merged their case
with the 17 firms that were given a grace of two weeks on Tuesday to
appear before the probe panel.
The Chairman of the House Committee on
Rules and Business, Mr. Albert Sam-Sokwa, explained that two of the 71
firms were also among the 17 marketers.
The 17 marketers had been slated to
refund N41.9bn to government coffers for refusing to appear before the
panel to defend their subsidy claims.
Following their complaint of not being
given fair hearing by the committee, the House on Tuesday gave the ad
hoc committee two weeks to listen to their case.
The House endorsed 61 out of the 62 recommendations of the panel, with a few amendments and introduced a new recommendation.
The additional recommendation, which
also summarised the position of the House on the probe, reads, “That the
resolutions of the House on the report of the fuel subsidy regime
should be served on Mr. President, the Senate and all anti-corruption
agencies for information and necessary actions.”
No comments:
Post a Comment