Nigerians have rejected single
tenure of seven years for President, state creation and 20 other
proposals, according to a report by the House of Representatives.
The Constitution Amendment consultation report also shows that Nigerians do not want immunity for governors on criminal matters.
They have asked the National Assembly to grant immunity to governors on civil cases.
The report on the poll survey conducted
by the House of Representatives Committee on Constitution Review,
scheduled for presentation last week, was deferred at the last minute
following tension over the outcome of the survey.
Although there were allegations of doctoring, the House leadership yesterday said such insinuations were false and unfounded.
The House said it only needed time to study the votes before consideration by the plenary.
According to the report, which our
correspondent stumbled upon, 21 of the 43 proposals presented to
Nigerians were accepted and 22 rejected.
Some of the 22 rejected proposals are as
follows: state creation; state Police; five, six, seven years single
tenure; 20 per cent derivation for oil producing states; states stopped
from controlling 50 per cent of their resources; no voting by Nigerians
in the Diaspora; no to two tiers of government; and true Federalism not
realistic.
The proposals endorsed by Nigerians are
autonomy for local governments; financial autonomy for Houses of
Assembly; abolition of State Joint Account as in Section 162(6) of the
Constitution; abolition of State Independent Electoral Commissions
(SIECs); and creation of Office of the AGF. The others are Minister of
Justice to operate outside the AGF; a separate Accountant-General of the
Federation for the Federation Accounts Allocation Committee (FAAC);
fresh electoral reforms to fix time limit for elections, by-elections,
electoral petitions; Federal Government to withhold allocations for
unelected local government chairmen (caretaker chairmen); constitutional
roles for traditional rulers; indigeneship for those who have resided
in an area for a long period; and no immunity for governors on criminal
cases.
The report reads in part: “The voters
asked the National Assembly to amend Section 162(6) of the 1999
Constitution to abolish Joint Account in states so that the allocations
of Local Government Areas can be paid directly to them. They said
allocation should not be given to unelected local government chairmen.
Instead, they voted that the Federal Government should withhold the
allocations of local government areas with caretaker chairmen.
“They also voted overwhelmingly for
financial autonomy for the state Houses of Assembly to ensure the
independence of the legislature.
“They voted for the reform of the
judiciary for quicker dispensation of justice. That the constitution be
amended to separate the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation
from the Minister of Justice for speedy dispensation of justice.
“A separate Office of the Accountant
General of the Federation for the Federation Account Allocation
Committee to give the nation a true picture of its revenues and
disbursement. This is necessary so that there will be equity.
“There should be time limit for
conducting elections, by-elections and electoral petitions. Section
197(1) (b) should be amended to abolish State Independent Electoral
Commissions (SIECs).
“Traditional rulers should be given a
constitutional role. For a Nigerian to be an indigene of any place, he
or she should have resided in an area for a long period and be accorded
accompanying right.”
On rejected proposals, the report said:
“Most of the respondents voted against state creation, state police,
five, six, seven years single tenure; 20 per cent derivation for oil
producing states.
“They also said states should be stopped
from controlling 50 per cent of their resources; no voting by Nigerians
in the Diaspora; and no to two tiers of government.”
A source involved in the collation said: “The votes have reflected the wishes of Nigerians.
“We will release the voting pattern so that Nigerians will know that the poll was scientifically conducted.
“If there is tension about the report,
it borders only on state creation. That is why some people are
insinuating that the report has been doctored.”
The Chairman of the House Committee on
Media and Public Affairs, Rep Zakari Mohammed, who spoke with our
correspondent, however, denied that the results were doctored.
He said the House deferred the consideration of the report on the survey to have more time to study it.
He said: “There is no question of
doctoring or killing the report of the poll. We only need time to study
the votes and I am assuring you that the report will soon be presented
to the House.
“So, the issue of doctoring does not
arise. Everybody wanted to be sure that what was voted for in his or her
constituency is reflected in the report.”
No comments:
Post a Comment